Managing the Fear of AI in the Workplace: A Guide for Employers

Even as the use of AI in the workplace expands rapidly, employees are expressing fear of the technology. Concerns range from increasing performance expectations and difficulty keeping up with rapid technological change, to a shortage of practical training and the fear of losing their jobs to AI.

This fear isn’t so much a technology problem as a leadership and communication challenge. When messaging is unclear, or managing through fear in an effort to increase performance only increases anxiety and disengagement, then morale, trust, and productivity all suffer.

This post examines the reasons behind employees’ fear of AI at work, the risks it poses to organizational performance, and how leaders can reframe AI in a more optimistic light. It also discusses what leaders should do instead of spreading fear and how team building can help build trust around AI.

How Employers Are Addressing AI Fear and Uncertainty at Work

In too many cases, leadership warns employees that new technology could render many of them obsolete, while simultaneously urging them to start using it immediately.¹Instead of inspiring employees to embrace the technology, this approach feeds into anxiety about job loss.

Those fears certainly aren’t unfounded. More than 10% of recently laid-off workers cited AI tools as a contributing factor in their job loss. 46% of business leaders “said they have already reduced their headcount because of AI, and 54% expect to employ fewer people within five years – up 13 percentage points from 2024.”²

Instilling fear of AI is most common in industries at high risk of AI-related employment threats, such as marketing, software development, finance, and publishing. It’s also more common in companies without a clear strategy for AI adoption, as well as among leaders who are simply bad bosses. Conversations about AI tend to be more positive in industries least at risk from job loss, including healthcare, education, construction, and skilled trades. Discussions are also more optimistic among effective leaders and in organizations with a clear, transparent strategy for AI adoption, where AI is positioned as a tool to help employees rather than replace them.

Why Employers Are Fueling Fear of AI Taking Over Jobs

There are many motivations behind messaging that emphasizes job loss and disruption. In some cases, leadership may use AI as an excuse for cost-cutting through headcount, to deflect blame from their own poor performance or missteps. Other executives hope the fear of AI at work will drive a sense of urgency among employees and lead to rapid transformation.

Other reasons why employers may instill fear of AI taking over jobs include:

• Genuine concern about AI’s impact, that they feel employees are not taking seriously enough¹
• Setting expectations for future downsizing¹
• The unprecedented pace of AI technology advancement is faster than they can predict or adapt to²
• Following the lead of other enterprise executives using fear of AI to justify job cuts³
• Pressure from above on middle managers to assess if AI can replace their reports.⁵

Ultimately, however, fueling AI fears is a bad leadership approach that can easily backfire, making employees feel threatened and undervalued, which in turn leads to reduced creativity, productivity, and psychological well-being.

The Risks of Spreading Fear About AI in the Workplace

Though corporate leaders may have justifiable reasons for spreading fear about AI, the approach entails several significant risks for their enterprises. These are potential perils worth pondering.

Drop in Morale and Workforce Engagement

The fear of job loss can cause anxiety, withdrawal, and disengagement in the workforce. Employees stop contributing new ideas or making any extra effort. As disengagement spreads, the most talented and productive workers may start seeking new opportunities elsewhere. Those who are less professionally mobile are more likely to complain to coworkers, spreading negativity that can damage the workplace culture.

These developments lead to an erosion of trust between leadership and staff. The downward spiral in retention, culture, and trust can only be reversed through a change in approach combined with activities that boost morale and employee engagement.

Decline in Innovation and Creative Risk-Taking

Fear discourages creativity, experimentation, and employee initiative just when rapid changes in workplace technology make these actions more important than ever. Employees may avoid rather than embrace the use of AI tools due to fear of making mistakes and placing their continued employment at even greater risk. Scaring employees about AI “can stifle creativity, inhibit collaboration, and lead to burnout.”¹

Company leaders send contradictory messages when they demand innovation while fostering fear. Only when employees are encouraged to try new tools and approaches to working with (rather than being replaced by) AI technology will they be comfortable using it to find inventive ways to improve productivity or enable new capabilities.

Rework from Low-Quality AI Output

Even companies that have tried to do things right and have enthusiastically embraced AI have seen disappointing returns on their efforts to date. Why?

One possible reason is that AI tools are being used to produce ‘workslop,’ or “AI-generated work content that masquerades as good work, but lacks the substance to meaningfully advance a given task.”⁶

One example of AI workslop, or simply “AI slop,” is bad copywriting, which can be not only boring but also undermine brand voice and damage customer trust, while actually increasing costs.

For example, “Sarah Skidd, a product marketing manager and freelance writer, was hired to revise the website copy generated by an AI tool for a hospitality company…Instead of the time- and cost-savings the client expected, the result was 20 hours of billable rewrites. Skidd told the BBC, ‘[The copy] was supposed to sell and intrigue, but instead it was very vanilla.’”⁷

Another example of AI slop is bad code. “In one case, a client used AI-generated code to update an event page. The shortcut crashed their entire website, causing three days of downtime and a $485 repair bill.”⁷

Why does this happen? Primarily because the intelligence is, well…artificial. It’s great at tasks like summarizing a large block of content or data, but it can’t possibly “create” (or even avoid making obvious mistakes) in the way a human can. “While AI can support data-driven insights, it lacks context, empathy, and judgment. AI outcomes reflect the data it’s given, which can be flawed, biased, or manipulated.”⁵

The most severe cost of AI may not be mistakes or rework, but its reputational damage to the employees who utilize it:

“Low effort, unhelpful AI-generated work is having a significant impact on collaboration at work. Approximately half of the people we surveyed viewed colleagues who sent workslop as less creative, capable, and reliable than they did before receiving the output. 42% saw them as less trustworthy, and 37% saw that colleague as less intelligent.”⁶

Compliance and Legal Exposure from AI Misuse

Organizations face numerous risks from the misuse of or excessive trust in the output from AI tools. For example, exposing customer data in queries of public AI tools can damage brand reputation and lead to lawsuits. Copyright infringement is another risk: while it might seem cute or clever to use the likeness of a celebrity or cartoon character in one of your company’s marketing videos, that won’t save you from a lawsuit.

In professions such as healthcare, law, finance, and education, relying on biased or inaccurate AI content can violate industry regulations. A lack of documentation and oversight in AI workflows can increase legal liability and audit risk.

“Organizations have a responsibility to implement AI ethically to avoid legal liability, protect their culture, and maintain trust among employees.”⁵

What Leaders Can Do Instead of Spreading Fear

Rather than spreading fear, leaders can position AI positively as a smart, capable workplace helper that automates boring, routine work, enabling employees to focus on more challenging and creative endeavors, and assisting them with those efforts as well.

Here are some practical, trust-building strategies for navigating AI adoption responsibly.

Invest in Retraining and Upskilling

Making employees comfortable with AI begins with properly training them on how to use it effectively. According to a recent LinkedIn survey, “employees are increasingly expected to know how to use AI.” But almost half say “they’re not using AI to its fullest capability, and 30% say they rarely or never use AI.” What’s more, “Over one-third of U.S. execs say they plan to incorporate employees’ AI skills into performance reviews or hiring criteria in the year ahead, per the report. However, many workers say they lack the training, resources, and time to master and incorporate this technology into their work.”⁹

Business leaders should “Provide deep instruction, free access, and additional training to help each person use AI to vastly increase proficiency and productivity. This retraining/upskilling effort would be expensive, but a meaningful way for well-off people and organizations to show leadership.”¹⁰

If AI takes over the majority of tasks for a specific role or worker, reskilling empowers employees to move into new, more valuable roles rather than replacing them. This increases employee loyalty, adaptability, and resilience.

“A job loss due to AI isn’t the end of the road. It’s a moment to step back and rethink how to move forward under a new path,” said John Morgan, president of LHH’s career transition and mobility business. “Career transformation is becoming more common, and more necessary, as AI changes how we work.”²

Clarify the Limitations of AI and Human Strengths

Instead of spreading fear about job losses, position AI as a tool that augments, rather than replaces, human expertise. Human judgment, nuance, and oversight are irreplaceable in areas ranging from professional writing to leadership skills, such as demonstrating empathy, making morally complex decisions, and resolving conflicts. AI in the workplace makes human interaction skills, like creativity and critical thinking, even more vital.

Although workers believe AI can perform certain management tasks better than their human leaders, many feel that the most human parts of management still belong to people, not machines:

• 64% say motivating teams is something only humans can do well.
• 57% say only humans can truly empathize and understand emotions.
• 53% believe only humans can make tough or morally complex decisions.
• 37% are concerned about AI’s lack of empathy.
• 29% worry AI leadership will make the workplace more impersonal and stressful.”¹¹

Furthermore, less than 20% trust AI to resolve team conflicts. Our Conflict Resolution Training workshop can teach your people, at all levels, how to more effectively manage conflicts in respectful, professional, and uniquely human ways.

Create Guardrails and Encourage Responsible Experimentation

Maximizing the value of AI to the business requires giving employees space to test AI with clear policies and guidelines in place. Yet, only 6% of organizations have roles dedicated to evaluating AI risk and implementing guardrails.⁸

“Employees need clear communication about what is safe, what is off-limits, and where to go for guidance…having a dedicated AI acceptable use policy is really helpful…tell employees exactly what the expectations are, what the risks are if they go outside of that policy, and what the consequences are.”⁸

Embracing this approach fosters a culture of safe experimentation, which can drive innovation and foster trust.

Reframing AI as a Productivity Booster, Not a Job Killer

Here’s the kicker: despite all of the fear being spread by leaders, many top executives don’t actually believe AI is a replacement for employees.

“75% of business leaders agree that AI isn’t a replacement for employees, and 80% agree that AI will mostly augment capabilities rather than replace them.”⁴ And a 2025 survey “found 54% of managers do not want to replace employees with AI tools, a big jump from the 39% who said the same in last year’s survey. Additionally, just 30% of managers said it would be financially beneficial if they could replace large numbers of employees with AI, down from 48% last year.”²

Avoiding AI is clearly not an option, nor is simply using it as an excuse to slash workforces likely to result in a positive outcome for companies. Instead, organizations should:

• Document AI benefits and limitations with hard data.
• Analyze which roles genuinely benefit from AI augmentation versus those that require human judgment, creativity, and relationship management.
• Frame AI policies around measurable business outcomes and competitive advantages.⁴

Corporate leaders will be better served by communicating the role of AI as one that helps, rather than threatens, their workforces. By streamlining workflows, freeing up time, and reducing burnout, AI can enable employees to focus on the more strategic and creative aspects of their roles, increasing their productivity while enhancing their work-life balance.

How Team Building Can Help Build Trust Around AI

Beyond professional anxiety and fear of job loss, another concern is that AI may be making your employees feel lonelier at work. Of employees who are pushed to use AI in the office, 84% said they felt loneliness.¹² And while “there’s a background problem of in-office loneliness as well (as employees, particularly in Gen Z, are finding it harder to make friends at work), AI may be worsening things.

“One reason AI may be contributing to loneliness…is that people are using it as part of what’s called ‘cognitive outsourcing.’ That’s the situation when a worker comes across an issue or a task that they need extra help to tackle, and before they turn to asking a colleague or a local expert, they seek aid from technology first.”¹²

The solution? “One way to tackle this complex problem is to encourage both AI use and better team building activities among your staff. Paying some attention to the soft, psychological fabric of your teams is as important as squeezing the most productivity out of them as you can with AI tools.”¹²

In-person experiences help build communication, trust, and collaboration. They help employees develop stronger relationships with coworkers, alleviating feelings of loneliness. Corporate team building activities focused on fun competition and bonding, such as our Build-a-Raft Competition or Race Car Rally, build “people skills” while helping to forge a strong team culture that reduces anxiety about workplace change.

Leadership development training and communication workshops can be vital for guiding employees through the AI transition from a human-centric perspective. For example, Igniting Team Performance® leads teams through a series of progressively complex challenges. Following up with targeted discussions, participants uncover what’s working, identify areas for growth, and immediately apply lessons in real-time.

Our Strength Finders assessment helps individuals identify their natural strengths, empowering them to envision new roles that augment their efforts with AI. Emotional Intelligence Training fosters empathy and helps participants strengthen team trust through open and effective communication.

Explore all of the options for corporate team building events and professional development here. When you’re ready to explore how these programs can help support your organization’s successful implementation of AI technology, contact us to start the conversation.

Sources:

1.   “Why CEOs are using AI to scare workers,” Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/20/ai-ceos-workers-jassy?utm_term=twsocialshare
2.   “AI-related layoffs can lead to longer unemployment period,” The Business Journals. https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2025/07/11/ai-layoffs-job-market-2025-skills-career-chatgpt.html?utm_source=bestcorporateevents
3.   “AI is changing the world faster than most realize,” Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/09/ai-rapid-change-work-school?utm_source=bestcorporateevents
4.   “Is AI Coming for Your Team Next? How AI Hype Is Becoming the Hot Layoff Excuse,” Forrester. https://www.forrester.com/blogs/is-ai-coming-for-your-team-next-how-ai-hype-is-becoming-the-hot-layoff-excuse/
5.   “Who deserves this promotion? Some managers are asking ChatGPT,” The Business Journals. https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2025/07/10/managers-ai-use-promotions-hiring-litigation.html?utm_source=bestcorporateevents
6.   “AI-Generated ‘Workslop’ Is Destroying Productivity,” Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2025/09/ai-generated-workslop-is-destroying-productivity?utm_source=bestcorporateevents
7.   “Relying Too Much on AI is Backfiring for Businesses,” Search Engine Journal. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/relying-too-much-on-ai-is-backfiring-for-businesses/550600/?source=bestcorporateevents
8.   “Employees are bringing their own AI tools to work and companies are scrambling to catch up,” Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/91394046/employees-are-using-ai-and-companies-arent-prepared?utm_source=bestcorporateevents
9. “AI learning gap fuels investor concerns,” Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/08/28/ai-skills-wall-street-invest-linkedin?utm_term=twsocialshare
10. “Behind the Curtain: An AI Marshall Plan,” Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/25/ai-united-states-government-plan?utm_source=bestcorporateevents&stream=top
11. “RoboBossing: 66% of Workers Say AI in Leadership Would Make the Workplace More Fair and Efficient,” Resume Now. https://www.resume-now.com/job-resources/careers/robobossing-report
12. “AI Could Be Making Your Workers Lonely. Here’s How to Fix That,” Inc.com. https://www.inc.com/kit-eaton/ai-could-be-making-your-workers-lonely-heres-how-to-fix-that/91220880